this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7533 readers
43 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Ultimately, outside of friends and followers, all media discovery is a popularity contest, can't really discover the least popular content... and it's usually for a good reason.

Threads is not a perfect solution, but I think it does have elements going in the right direction. Mallory doesn't have a "page" like a subreddit, there is no group of mods with power over the whole conversation; even if multiple people were to share an account, even if they added an "automod" bot... they still only have direct power over direct replies, not sub-replies. Astroturfing, gang upvoting, and bot saturation are still a thing, but the ability to shape conversations by selective pruning and cherry picking, is much more limited. Mallory's options are: either to let people disagree, or to create multiple fake accounts, or to fall off the popularity contest.

Then, each comment/post/repost is its own ecosystem, the only common mod ruleset is from "daddy Meta"... which has its own issues, but not nearly the issues of a subreddit.

At the end of the day, all communication platforms fall somewhere between "single person dictatorship" (static web pages) and "anything goes" (4chan). There is no magic bullet, so far.

IMHO, right now Threads is more chaotic than Reddit or Lemmy, but has the tools to avoid becoming a 4chan or even a Facebook (somewhat ironically).