Selfhosted

39251 readers

318 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Anyone using rustic? (github.com)

submitted 1 year ago by maiskanzler@feddit.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey, you probably know about restic and borg for backups. They are pretty mature and very commonly used.

Rustic is a fully compatible reimplementation of restic in Rust and they do seem to have implemented a few improvements over restic. The developer even used to be a contributor on restic.

Is anyone here using it already? It looks super promising but I'd love to hear your opinion!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is the advantage of using this over restic?

[–] saddlebag@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They have a page in the repo describing some advantages https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic/blob/main/docs/comparison-restic.md

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

It sounds like they have some nice improvements, but I wonder why they didn't contribute them back to the original restic project.

I also wouldn't rely on an immature piece of software to handle backups - you want to avoid as many risk factors as possible with backups, since when you need to restore you really need it to work.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

FYI, you formated your link wrong, it should be [here](https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic/blob/main/docs/comparison-restic.md)

[–] saddlebag@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can never remember the order and I’m using Wefwef which doesn’t offer markdown insert. Thanks :)

[–] 418teapot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The way I remember the order is that the parentheses around the link would make grammatical sense outside of markdown (the goal of markdown is to still be fully readable even when looking at the raw source).

For example if I were posting on a forum that didn't have markdown support which one of these would make more sense:

You can find that on this lemmy instance (https://lemmy.world).
You can find that on (this lemmy instance) https://lemmy.world.

Option 2 makes no sense grammatically. Then you just need to use the square brackets (which rarely show up in non-markdown text) to denote the link range.

Alternatively, if you still have a hard time remembering the order, you can use reference-style links which make it even more readable outside of markdown rendered contexts (note that there are no parentheses in this version, nothing to get confused):

[Here is a link][1] and [here is another link][2].

[1]: http://example.org
[2]: http://example.com

[–] anteaters@feddit.de -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Looks like the rust-cult is at it again rewriting existing stuff for no gain but pushing rust on others.

[–] dabe@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A lot of the time, rust rewrites are more for devs, than users. Rust code is just easier to maintain (in the long-run 😉) and harder to make buggy. But some times the apps do just run faster when compiled with Rust.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it that much better than Go? Seems like the original restic was written in Go which afaik is pretty similar performance and syntax wise.

[–] beeb@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Go has its fair share of design problems and is not as memory efficient due to its garbage collector. Also it will probably always be linked to Google in some way.

[–] Celediel@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use fd instead of find, or rg instead of grep and tell me there's no gain. The speed increase alone is astounding, and beyond worth it.

[–] dabe@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, will definitely be trying this out. I tend to make wildly overzealous find searches