this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
144 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5197 readers
668 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some of the largest U.S. insurance companies say extreme weather has led them to end certain coverages, exclude natural disaster protections and raise premiums

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If insurers are refusing to cover disasters, then mortgage lenders should be unable to force buyers to buy (useless) insurance

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

silly cat, that's not how big business collusion and corruption work. mortage lenders will continue to force prospective homeowners to cover and maintain insurance on their properties even if it causes them to default on their payments, then they'll sell the homes again to flippers or multinationals.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Ah I see. Sounds like big business collusion should be hunted to extinction.

[–] thbb@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

And bankrupt and dispossess the lender if a disaster happens to their newly acquired home?

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

mortgage lenders are going to have to do something. Like require natural disaster be part of the policy. Otherwise they will have people walking away from mortgages after disasters.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

then they would lose income, not going to happen. let's be honest, premiums will go up and coverage will go down.