this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
206 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

55715 readers
5725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

computer vision is definitely a software problem.

No, it isn't.

If it were only software, don't you think Tesla should be the best of them all, being the pure software shop they are?

But it is a real world problem. Recognizing real objects in real world conditions like weather, natural and artificial lights, temperatures (want some ice on your camera?), winds & storms, all kinds of unforeseen circumstances, other bad drivers, police and firemen...

And that's why that pure software shop is so bad at it, while all the real carmakers shrug... they are used to it since forever.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

You can be the best in the world and still not be good enough.

Driving a car around using a dozen cameras pointing in every direction isn't something that's fundamentally impossible. We just can't do it yet.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And don't forget vision is what humans use for navigation as well.

[–] TopShelfVanilla@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

And a lot of them are not good at it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)