this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
10 points (77.8% liked)

Canada

7517 readers
968 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article Author: Andrew Allison, Philosophy PhD Student, University of Calgary

Excerpt from article: (emphasis mine)

The independence of central banks from the democratic process has been a bedrock of economic policy for decades. The Bank of Canada is no exception, maintaining distance from elected officials to ensure monetary policy is free from political pressures.

However, a clear division between central bank and government could be tested with Mark Carney, former governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England who’s running for leadership of the Liberal Party and, in turn, the role of prime minister.

His bid raises concerns about how central bank independence might be perceived under a Carney-led government. Could his tenure as a central banker result in the Bank of Canada’s independence being clawed back? After all, he has demonstrated his ability to manage monetary policy at the highest levels.

The answer, if we want to preserve the economic benefits of central bank independence, is clear: the Bank of Canada’s independence must be preserved. And Carney, who has championed the importance of politically neutral monetary policy, would likely agree.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

HELP!!

OH NO!!!!!!

One of the world's leading economists is trying to "interfere" with the BoC

Oh no!!

I mean PP is going to interfere with them too. Sure know which one I'd rather have "interfering"

Also this article reeks of a CON attempt (aka it's blatantly obvious and pretty stupid) to discredit Carney through misinformation.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And it's UofC. You can have all the free thought you want at the UofC, as long as it's conservative in nature.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There have been some issues with bias with the university admin, but I wouldn't say that's the case with the university as a whole

For example

https://www.reddit.com/r/UCalgary/comments/10lgm6a/may_2023_elections_is_our_chance_to_get_what_we/

I'm on mobile and I can't check, but is this the riding that the university falls under?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calgary-Varsity

As for the author, I'm not sure. The profile only has this article, and I'm not well versed on the area of research to know if there is a bias or not

https://theconversation.com/profiles/andrew-allison-1511511/articles

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's well known. I'm actually a polisci grad from another university, we all knew that if it was boot licking conservative, we didn't even need to look at the header, we knew where it came from. I mean sure, it's important not to paint people with wide swath brushes, but that school is heavily heavily tainted with conservative one-track mind.

Edit: I should point out, just to your point, like a famous grad of UofC was Naheed Nenshi, so non-cons exist there. But the issue at the UofC, for every Nenshi there's like five Danielle Smiths. Makes sense, I mean Alberta is a con stronghold, and has been since forever pretty much. So it goes to say of course the UofC is too. But it's just a bit over the top.