this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
363 points (98.4% liked)

News

24403 readers
4462 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump plans to impose tariffs of up to 100% on semiconductors manufactured in Taiwan, aiming to push U.S. tech companies like Apple, Nvidia, and AMD to produce chips domestically.

The tariffs target Taiwan's TSMC, a key supplier, despite its partial U.S. production in Arizona.

Trump criticized Biden’s CHIPS Act for funding companies like Intel and proposed tariffs as an alternative incentive.

Experts warn the move could raise prices for electronics as most TSMC chips are assembled in Asia before export to the U.S.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Tariffs are the kind of tool that... is almost always the worst possible choice as a punitive action. The cost is inherently passed to the local populace. So, at best, people are deprived of a luxury. At worst, people are paying an increased cost for a necessity.

Tariffs only actually work when you already have a comparable infrastructure and are trying to force the local populace to use it. Theoretically, those are the Intel and TSMC (...) fabs in the Southwest (?). But none of them are anywhere near ready to handle the consumer electronics that consumers actually want.

And yeah. A strict tariff would not impact a case where companies two hop products (which is basically how all "made in america" stuff works but that is a different mess). That said, if the tariffs on Canada take effect Saturday, it will still be very significant costs to US consumers as anything would need to be imported from Europe (MAYBE Mexico but that adds other issues).

That said, we aren't living in a world of laws. So "tariffs" on actual companies that are deeemed to be doing workarounds could happen. How enforceable that would be is anyone's guess, but you can be sure that everyone will be glad to jack up their prices because Apple might have to.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about a company doing a workaround, but people buying things from lverseas instead of buying things manufactured locally that needed tariffed parts.

A company hat manufactures smart bands in the US will have to increase the price to offset the chip cost increase, but xiaomi surely won't so the "local" choice will be even more undesirable. I know that China has a global yoke on smart bands but you get the idea.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

You may want to actually read the tracking page for your international purchases. When they get held up at a port or international airport? That is when the package is being inspected. Generally it is just weighed and someone eyeballs the declaration form and says "I don't get paid enough for this shit". That said, order enough stuff on aliexpress and you'll have one or two packages get held for a few days and arrive to you wrapped in duct tape.

Very short term? Yeah, you can get away with lying on declaration forms. But that "big box of books" from Taiwan is going to raise a lot of red flags and then you are in a different mess.