this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
18 points (95.0% liked)

Anime

2035 readers
104 users here now

This community is the place to discuss and ask questions about anime, anime news, and related topics.

Currently airing show discussion threads are created by our resident bot, rikka@ani.social. If it doesn't make a thread for an episode that you want to discuss, see the user guide on the wiki for instructions on how to ask rikka to make a thread for you to use.

Check out our wiki to find:

Rules

More complete rules on the wiki.

Related General Communities

rikka

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Botsuraku Yotei no Kizoku dakedo, Hima Datta kara Mahou wo Kiwamete mita, episode 1

Alternative NamesBotsurakuKizoku, 没落貴族


Additional Links


Reminder: Please do not discuss plot points not yet seen or skipped in the show. Failing to follow the rules may result in a ban.


All discussions

Episode Link
1 Link

This post was created by a bot. Message the mod team for feedback and comments. The original source code can be found on GitHub.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NineSwords@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah but this is issue is also why isekai is so damn rampant. As an author it’s a bit of a cheat to have your MC not know anything so obviously they get things told to them instead of doing more subtle world building.

I don't think this is an isekai problem. While yes, it's a narrative crutch that makes exposition easier, it's not used in the way you mentioned. As shown here in this anime it can even be a detractor. I've read hundreds of isekai novels that don't fall into the same narrative traps as seen here. I think in this case it's just a bad author (or screenwriter) and the exposition would be just as bad without the isekai aspect. The audience needs exposition regardless of the setting.

Where the isekai setting helps as a narrative crutch is explaining things to the reader/viewer in modern earth terms. I.e. "that dragon was as big as a school bus".

Your John Wick example is a great example of "show;don't tell" exposition where the writer/director had faith in the intelligence of the audience. We get it even without spelling it out. And if we don't we'll look it up online or discuss it with our peers until we get it. I really wish this type of exposition were the general rule, but I feel like it's being used less and less. It's this "no viewers left behind" mentality where studios are afraid to confuse even a fraction of the audience.