Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
What is your definition of food? Because it certainly fits mine and the dictionary's.
Fast food in general is neither nutritious nor does it particularly maintain life and growth. Arguably it does the opposite.
Mainly fast food is a profit center for the industrialized food chain. It's designed to maximize the extractable value from cheap raw ingredients through extensive processing and to provide a sustainable revenue stream for large corporations by fucking with your body's natural taste and diet control mechanisms.
If you want good food fast then you are far better making it yourself or if you are not able to do that, finding a taco truck or similar independent vendor who does not rely on highly processed crap disguised as "food". In many parts of the world street vendors are common and personally I want to encourage that as much as possible.
People want to make my comments out to be some kind of elitist blah blah whatever when in fact they are the opposite. My desire is to strongly encourage people to maintain their food independence and health and to stop supporting huge corporations out of convenience and ignorance.
By that definition Burger King is food, you can survive on it and gain enough nutritional value to allow you to grow.
It's not as nutritious as home made cooking, but claiming it has no nutrition is factually inaccurate.
I'm not saying it is good for you, or that you can survive eating only whoppers (but you also can't survive eating the same salad over and over so it's a moot point). But by any definition of the word Burger King and other fast foods are food, extremely calorically dense and filled to the brim with saturated fat food.
Technically, dirt contains some nutritional value. So yeah, you are correct that fast food does contain some nutrition. Eating a diet of strictly potatoes will, technically, allow you to "grow" but like industrial fast food, will come with adverse health consequences. So the question isn't if it technically has some amount of nutritional value but whether it's actually good for you. Does the "food" allow you to maintain life and grow to a degree consistent with the average seems to me to be a reasonable definition.
A diet with a lot of fast food is nutritionally poor and full of many things such as sugar, salt, and saturated fats that cause long-term adverse health consequences. It's been linked to everything from a lower capacity for memory and learning to diabetes, heart disease and of course obesity.
There is simply no way that you can say that fast food is "good" for you or that it should be eaten routinely. Making the clear distinction that fast "food" is not food to the same degree as a healthful diet is one of the best things you can do for community health.
I never said it's healthy or that someone should eat it regularly, so that's a strawman. But it is still food, with much higher nutritional value than dirt, and it can definitely sustain you, which you yourself admitted, so by that same definition you gave fast food is food.
Define "sustain".
You are reading a lot into my words in order to try to be right about a quibbling little thing and frankly it's annoying.
If you're stuck in an island for years where the only thing you have to eat is fast food you will survive therefore food. The same cannot be said for dirt.
LOL. What was that you were saying about a strawman?
You asked for a definition of sustain, I gave you a concrete example of what I would use to qualify things as providing sustenance, or indeed qualifying as food. Which is why I qualify fast food as food, you on the other hand do not, so perhaps you should define sustain instead of asking for my definition.
Nope. You shifted your goal posts and are determined to be "right" at any costs. You don't even have an actual point to make.
Good bye.
I never shifted my goals, from the beginning I'm calling you out on saying fast food is not food, you're the one who used dirt as a counter example of things that are clearly not food yet would, according to you, fit the definition of food. I'm giving you an example that clearly exemplifies why fast food sustains you, and is therefore food, but dirt doesn't. If you weren't babbling on and on trying to throw as many arguments as possible to try to evade from the simple fact that you haven't even given a food definition that doesn't include fast food you might see the point that by any meaningful definition of the word (including the one you gave) fast food is food.