this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

1679 readers
315 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It also reignites the row over the UK’s ban on the fishing of sand eels – designed to protect Britain’s population of puffins which eat the small fish, but hated by some EU countries that catch them in huge quantities – by insisting that Britain takes into account the “socio-economic consequences” on European fishing communities of its policies on managing stocks.

investigates

Apparently it's Denmark.

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/eel-or-no-eel-an-early-test-for-the-uk-eu-reset/

The fishing of sand eels in English North Sea and Scottish waters was recently banned in order to protect depleted stocks, which are a vital food source for local marine wildlife including puffins and porpoises. The ban has wide support from normally pro-EU environmental groups in the UK, even though the EU questions whether a blanket ban is ‘evidence-based, proportionate and non-discriminatory’. The Danish government argues that it amounts to de facto discrimination against Danish vessels, who take 99% of the sand eel catch in that area.

Hmm.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand_eel

Traditionally, they have been little exploited for human food, but are a major target of industrial fishing for animal feed and fertilizer.[4] Increasing fishing for them is thought to be causing problems for some of their natural predators, especially the auks, which take them in deeper water.

An instance of this was the RSPB report linking a population crash of seabirds in the North Sea to fishing for sand eels.[5][6] This led to political pressure for the closure of this fishery; the seabird populations subsequently improved.[7]

I'm not sure that there's a viable way to protect puffin food in a particular location in a way that's going to affect countries by different proportions, unless one is going to just ship in food for the puffins from elsewhere.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I'm not against fishing, but there's something wrong if you take fish and then just turn it into fertilizer or chicken feed. Good on the UK for banning this.