this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
213 points (93.8% liked)

micromobility - Ebikes, scooters, longboards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

2396 readers
25 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you’re looking for an affordable and accessible way to live longer, skip the pricey wellness retreats and quirky biohacks—just bike to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

new study confirms

No it doesn't. Their conclusion is "This study strengthens the evidence that active commuting has population-level health benefits and can contribute to reduced morbidity and mortality."

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

sounds like confirmation to me, an apt popular science headline. maybe you think “confirms” means “proves”?

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, english is not my first language, but according to Google (they get their word meanings from Oxford) "confirm" means "establish the truth or correctness of (something previously believed or suspected to be the case)." Perhaps in this specific situation "confirm" has different meaning?

Also, there is a lot wrong how science is communicated in popular media. Taking singular study, coming up with sensational (and incorrect) title and making statements that aren't in line with the study is not the way how science should be communicated. Even if there are multiple news outlets writing numerous such articles doesn't make it right, correct or even acceptable.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 days ago

definitely not trying to speak well of all popular science titles, just saying that this one seems perfectly acceptable :)

and yeah, that Oxford dictionary isn’t giving you the definition used in the scientific sense, so that’s your problem:

The term “confirmation” is used in epistemology and the philosophy of science whenever observational data and evidence “speak in favor of” or support scientific theories and everyday hypotheses. utm.edu

i checked Oxford Learner’s, and the meaning used in this context is number 2 just below what you found.

to make a position, an agreement, etc. more definite or official; to establish somebody/something clearly

language is confusing but this is definitely the scientific one the article means.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Confirm pretty much does mean prove, especially in this context.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

false, sorry op/mod you are wrong especially in this context: https://iep.utm.edu/confirmation-and-induction/

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, maybe it's just been a long day but I don't quite see how that means that confirmation does not mean anything other than it is either proven or at least very likely to be the case.

The first sentence is

The term “confirmation” is used in epistemology and the philosophy of science whenever observational data and evidence “speak in favor of” or support scientific theories and everyday hypotheses. "

I haven't exhaustively read every bit of the webpage but so far I am not seeing anything that contradicts the above. What am I missing here?

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

proven or at least very likely to be the case.

two very different things :) scientific folks try to be very specific with their language

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Splitting hairs, but that's science for you I guess. To be fair, I did say "pretty much" though :P