this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
48 points (88.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44170 readers
1811 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you do, then what exactly defines a soul in your view?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

“Soul” is just consciousness. Which many people seem to equate to the brain here.

There is 0 scientific evidence that consciousness has anything to do with our brains. Much to the contrary actually.

Consciousness truly is one of the biggest mysteries of life. We all experience it, but the more you observe it, the less you can find it.

It may feel at first as it’s a phenomena of the brain, of the mind. But soon after you start paying really close attention to it, you realize that consciousness is behind the mind. It’s underneath it.

It observes the mind. It observes everything. And that’s what it is. Perceiving. Aware of everything.

Its the only indivisible and irreducible thing in the universe that we ever found. Consciousness just is. It is the awareness in you. It is the awareness in everything.

When we crack consciousness, all these talks of “souls”, “god”, “atheism”, will seem just silly tbh.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This makes no sense to me. It's just generic platitudes and a wild claim.

You say "quite the contrary", claiming there is scientific evidence of consciousness having nothing to do with our brains. Where can I find this evidence?

I couldn't follow any of your reasoning. Can you summarize your central thesis? Because we observe...?

I don't see how conscience could not have anything to do with our brain when that is where it arises.

[–] Fenzik@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There is 0 scientific evidence that consciousness has anything to do with our brains. Much to the contrary actually.

Source? Everything I’ve read on the topic suggests that it’s to do with the brain - damaged brain = no consciousness, even if the rest of the body fine.

Its the only indivisible and irreducible thing in the universe that we ever found. Consciousness just is.

Elementary particles would like a word.