this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
723 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37581 readers
519 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 147 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Very strongly worded, but yes.

Brave have had a history of controversy since their inception. Every time something happens, the CEO went on a marketing campaign across social media and drummed up enough new users to drown it out. However the attitude of the business is clear: it would take a very small sack of money for Brave to sell out its users.

If you're going to use a Chromium web browser, there are non-commercial open source projects that don't have a history of shady shit. However Firefox forks are better.

[–] realslef@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] sickday@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Also Mull and Iceraven from F-Droid

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, but why? What’s wrong with Firefox and how do the forks address those points?

[–] sickday@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I posted the list of alternatives simply because OP asked for forks.

What’s wrong with Firefox

Me posting this list shouldn't be an implication that I believe Firefox to be bad. I'm offering alternatives as the OP requests.

and how do the forks address those points?

Every one of the links I shared have detailed information about how their product mutates the original Firefox or Chromium browser. Do you really need me to copy-paste that information into a comment?

[–] music938@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

Mullvad , LibreWolf and Tor.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Other people have given desktop examples. For Android, I use Mull, which also has a companion Android System Webview implementation (Chromium) called Mulch. These are baked into the DivestOS ROM, which itself is a fork of LineageOS.

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does it support extensions like Firefox?

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, full support for desktop Firefox extensions. I think it also comes with uBlock Origin by default.

[–] AbsolutelyNotCats@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just saw it does support custom add-on collections like Firefox beta and nightly... I'm going to give it a try

Edit: it supports startpage as search engine out of the box as well!

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

All I can say is try DivestOS :)

My opinion: It doesn't have full customisation (compared to eg. CRDroid) but it does at least have call recording and long press back button = kill app process, along with traffic monitors for the status bar. All regular phone calls have a banner at the top reminding you that they're not secure (as opposed to E2E encrypted chat calls over the internet) and Location permission settings seem to be a bit more expansive than other ROMs.

load more comments (10 replies)