this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
175 points (98.3% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
55056 readers
160 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They can't find an address. He's very likely a basement dweller sucking off the tit from one of his family relatives to sustain his standard of living
That's why Nintendo wants to serve his family members cause they probably know he's at one of them...~~and once he's been served they're responsible to send it to him or else they will be held accountable~~
Edit: not true
That's not true. Nintendo wants to serve to family members because they (officially) haven't been able to get through to him yet, and his family members may be able to contact him where Nintendo has not been able to.
I also doubt the family members have any legal requirement to serve the papers to him. That would be a bit ridiculous. Imagine if some lawyer could hand you random court summons and now you're legally required to find this person and serve the papers. You may say that it's not the same situation because they're related, but at what point are you related enough to a person where you can have this legal duty thrust upon you, especially given how most people have family members they're not in direct contact with? He's not criminally wanted; they wouldn't be hiding a fugitive or whatever if they refuse to serve (assuming they even know where he is, which it's perfectly plausible they don't).
In any case, it shouldn't really matter. The streamer has demonstrated publicly that he's aware of the lawsuit and at some point that will probably be deemed sufficient notice, possibly for the case to continue in his absence if he continues to be unresponsive.
Wait, serving a legal notice can be made transitive to people not part of the legal system?
Like, I could just sue someone the other end of the country and then arrange things so that the notice is delegated to my landlord if (small if) they're being a jerk?