this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
631 points (98.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8775 readers
209 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
631
A Valve engineer fixed 3D lighting so hard he had to tell all the graphics card manufacturers their math was wrong, and the reaction was: 'I hate you' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"It's a bit technical," begins Birdwell, "but the simple version is that graphics cards at the time always stored RGB textures and even displayed everything as non linear intensities, meaning that an 8 bit RGB value of 128 encodes a pixel that's about 22% as bright as a value of 255, but the graphics hardware was doing lighting calculations as though everything was linear.

"The net result was that lighting always looked off. If you were trying to shade something that was curved, the dimming due to the surface angle aiming away from the light source would get darker way too quickly. Just like the example above, something that was supposed to end up looking 50% as bright as full intensity ended up looking only 22% as bright on the display. It looked very unnatural, instead of a nice curve everything was shaded way too extreme, rounded shapes looked oddly exaggerated and there wasn’t any way to get things to work in the general case."

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Made harder by brightness being perceived non - linearly. We can detect a change in brightness much easier in a dark area than a light- if the RGB value is 10%, and shifts to 15%, we'll notice it. But if it's 80% and shifts to 85%, we probably won't.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

Reminds me of a video I watched where they tested human perception of 60/90/120 FPS. They had an all white screen and flashed a single frame of black at various frame rates, and participants would press a button if they saw the change. Then repeated for an all black screen and a single frame of white would flash.

At 60 and 90 FPS, most participants saw the flash. At 120 FPS, they only saw the change going from black to white.

[–] polle@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sick!