this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
11 points (55.7% liked)

World News

32077 readers
1011 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

only a handful of investigators at most have been assigned to work on the Nord Stream case on a full-time basis.

the perception among investigators is that the will to solve the case is not particularly pronounced in the capital. Politically, it is easier to live with what happened if it remains unclear who is behind the attacks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yeah, all this evidence like:

One of the three or four ships in the world with a moon pool that could supply and enable divers to work at the depth of the pipeline, hanging around the area after a naval maneuver less than five days before the explosion

A US Navy anti-submarine plane (indeed, one of the only planes in the world with the ability to generate a signal that would reach to the depth of the pipeline) flying the length of the pipeline almost exactly 24 hours before the explosion

And the Commander in Chief of the most ~~expensive~~ powerful military in the world, explaining that the Nordstream pipelines would be brought offline by any means necessary (not shown in the photo, he is standing literally right next to Olaf Scholz - the Chancellor of Germany - who did not even attempt to contradict his statement).

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Great, the hexbear loonies escaped the asylum again

[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bootlickers: try not to respond with accusations of mental illness challenge: (IMPOSSIBLE) (GONE WRONG) (GONE NATO)

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

If there was ever any proof needed of a mental deficiency with a hexbear user, you just gave it. Well done!

[–] ToxicDivinity@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Do you have a rebuttal to the argument or are you just trolling?

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I mean... Man's got a good point here lol. As far as circumstantial evidence goes, this is pretty damning.