this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
516 points (94.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

30044 readers
701 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's already defined that way - from Wikipedia "From 1983 until 2019, the metre was formally defined as the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299792458 of a second. After the 2019 redefinition of the SI base units, this definition was rephrased to include the definition of a second in terms of the caesium frequency ΔνCs. "

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just because it's defined as some section of a light year does not mean it's using a light year as a reference. You could use a foot and find the fraction of a light year that represents it, but that doesn't mean that the foot is based on a light year.

I'm saying the short measure that we use on a daily basis might be a BASE 10 portion of a light year. Not 1/299792458 of a light second.

P.S. It's like being on Reddit, being download for conjecturing.

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see what you mean. That is just as arbitrary as using the Earth's size or any other reference. There's nothing special about a year.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Touché

My ignorance shows it's ugly face again.

[–] accidental@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

it's a hard thing for me to wrap my head around, but it's cool when you think about it: there's actually no possible shared reference; even with atomic clocks, based solely on the bouncing of cesium atoms ticking away, the distance travelled is dependent on acceleration in your reference frame.

relativity really is!