this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
664 points (80.7% liked)

memes

10670 readers
1934 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

NO ONE IS GETTING BANNED FOR CRITISIZING THE US HERE. In fact, it's the norm here. Now, can you tell me how much I can badmouth the ccp on ml???

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you show me an example of a well-reasoned and well-sourced criticism of China that triggered moderation action?

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I got banned simply for stating that China is a centrally planned economy. Is that a bannable of fence nin your view despite it being the main description on Wikipedia and among most economists?

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

From your description, that certainly sounds like an uncontroversial take, I would love to see the actual post though.... Commonly people's summaries of posts that got them banned differ quite drastically from the actual post

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You must be joking? There is a whole community of people posting how they got banned from ml for the most asinine reasons. Are you serious right now?

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, being on .ml myself I would probably have the worst visibility on that but when I have seen people actually look at the mod log, it generally doesn't agree with the posters claimed rationale for the ban