this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
176 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
176
How decentralized is Bluesky really? (dustycloud.org)
submitted 1 month ago by garretble@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is a pretty great, long form post about the structure of Bluesky, and how it's largely kinda pretending to be decentralized at the moment. I'm not trying to make a dig at it. I've enjoyed the platform myself for a while, but it's good to learn more about how it actually works.

This article was shared on Mastodon via its author here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 97 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure it can, unless they want to pay server operators. Who would do that for free for a for-profit company? And if they're ultimately supported by the top, they're still centralized.

Not that it's super expensive to run a server, but it ain't free; at least in a place like the Fediverse, every transaction is voluntary all the way down to the financial support, because any part may choose to participate or leave as they see fit.

I don't see how BlueSky can replicate that and still chase profit.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought I read something that said one of the servers or services or something was already like 4.8 terabytes and growing by the day.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 1 month ago

but even if you wanted to run that, you cant because they wont release the software or interact with foreign relays.

they dont even let you choose to grab the 4.8tb which is <10% of my home storage

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

It's in the article.