Technology

60052 readers

3387 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

620

DOJ to ask judge to force Google to sell off Chrome, Bloomberg reports (neuters.de)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What’s to stop them just making another browser?

Nothing. Chromium is open source. So they could just fork it and declare a new "official" google browser and it would be a lot like Chrome.

I'm not sure why the govt thinks forcing google to give up a particular fork/branch of an open source browser is all that meaningful. It might make more sense if Chrome was a closed source one of a kind browser.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve worked in the aftermath of DoJ agreements like this one. The DoJ is not stupid (or at least didn’t used to be) and will have stipulations about removing Google employees from governance/write permissions to the project, with follow up check-ins every few months to make sure any shenanigans aren’t occurring.

..none of that matters though now that the DoJ is going to be dissolved.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

They need to ban them from forking the browser. Google has the ability to get people to install the new Google totally-not-chrome browser. Especially if they keep Android as well.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I was thinking. It also makes Chrome essentially worthless to anyone except Google.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe as a whole package, but node.js servers are ubiquitous and have a ton of stakeholders that have nothing to do with web browsers.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What does Chrome have to do with a node.js server?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Same JS engine, same maintainers, same iron-grip control by Google.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've got no idea what you're talking about here.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

The JavaScript (code) engine that powers Chrome is the same JavaScript (code) engine that powers Node servers. Node is used to power a large portion of web applications and internal corporate tools. The Chromium/Node project is under the tight control of Google engineers.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Are you saying Google funds node.js development?