this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
613 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
3675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If France can find space, surely Germany can.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If Finland could find space, Germany definitely can.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Idk, Finland has a much lower population density vs Germany. France is something like 1/2 the population density, but they also have >50 reactors, so surely Germany can find room for a few...

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago
  • Finland: 338,145 km² and 5.6 million people
  • Germany: 357,596 km² and 82 million people

Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again?

Yup, but population density should be what matters, because that implies how much usable space there is for waste disposal.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Finland with it's vast swathes of frozen tundra.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We don't have vast swaths of Frozen Tundras. This isn't Alaska.

And it's actually stored south not north.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago