679
The world's corporations produce so much climate change pollution, it could eat up about 44% of their profits if they had to pay damages for it (phys.org)
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 10 months ago

'Wildly profitable' would not be enough to them.

'Extremely profitable' would not be enough to them.

'Insanely profitable' would not be enough to them.

Infinite growth is one hell of a drug.

[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago

See also: any other form of cancer.

[-] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 15 points 10 months ago

Infinite growth, until you kill your host. In this case the host is the whole human population.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Honestly, the whole world.

Will it recover? Maybe. Life is resilient.

But we've already presided over a pretty quick mass extinction that is still ongoing.

[-] Neon_Dystopia@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Life on earth has recovered from several mass extinctions, life finds a way. Humans are cooked though. Best of luck to the next sapient species to evolve.

[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The only time infinite growth would be possible is if we became a space faring species and colonized other planets. That would allow us to continue population growth.

Outside of that, infinite growth is impossible since there’s only so many people on this planet and even less who can afford their products.

[-] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Capitalism and infinite growth is a microcosm of an organisms drive for infinite growth, which is usually curtailed by all sorts of biological and evolutionsry processes. Like space limitations and scarcity of resources, and I'm trying to figure out what is different between the individuals that form these mega corps and the average organism.

I dunno. Is this a stupid train of thought?

[-] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Nah, it's a intelligently reasonable argument. The world would be saved if we could be rational like this.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
679 points (99.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4664 readers
499 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net