this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
376 points (96.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

30049 readers
645 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I've been wondering something, specifically related to something I heard mentioned last night on a stream: their hypothesis was that real life ground game, door knocking or whatever, doesn't matter any more, and the modern 'ground game' is social media and 1:1 conversations.

When 'reasonable' people delete/deleted twitter/facebook in droves, are we just ceding the ground game to the racists and the ones who can shout the most hate?

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When 'reasonable' people delete/deleted twitter/facebook in droves, are we just ceding the ground game to the racists and the ones who can shout the most hate?

Leaving a toxic environment that also is a privacy and advertising nightmare will always be an excellent personal choice.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The point being, an excellent personal choice at the expense of the greater whole?

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago

I believe having a good, healthy personal foundation allows people to make better choices for their communities.

[–] ELO@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

It isn't worth it. At least for me at this point. When you are dealing with the ineptitude of the simple-minded masses—which is either bandied at best or they are totally blinded by hatred from vacuuming up disinformation without an iota of effort to fact-check anything—the best hope is face-to-face discourse. But even then you are unlikely to change most peoples' minds that they have been deluded and taken for a ride—especially the older they are. Which is sad and frankly disturbing. One of the most disgusting things to me is a myopic person who is so intransigent, that they can't for a moment believe they might be mistaken about something.

From looking at the line I was in voting, it's no wonder this happened: these simple-minded geriatrics turned out in droves for their dictator.

GOP: Geriatrics for an Orwellian Power

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

leaves Earth

Gooood byeeeeeeeeeeeee

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

are we just ceding

it was a noble effort, but that battle is lost. at this point you're just making yourself a target. not that social medias won't relinquish your data to the gestapo the instant it's demanded. which they probably did years ago

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I still somewhat cling to this same belief although I think it's a futile effort as you're not just competing against randos online, but networks of bots, disinformation campaigns, state actors, and an army of gullible individuals who parrot their rhetoric. You just can't compete against that as a single person.