this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
778 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

60130 readers
2683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
778
OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
357 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

First, we don’t have to make AI.

Second, it’s not about it being unable to learn, it’s about the fact that they aren’t paying the people who are teaching it.

[–] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then give the AI a library card, feel better?

[–] FatCrab@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reasoning that claims training a generative model is infringing IP would still mean a robot going into a library with a card it has to optically read all the books there to create the same generative model would still be infringing IP.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same way that counting cards is illegal

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Counting cards isn’t illegal though lol

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly and neither is this.

[–] AncientMariner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humans can judge information make decisions on it and adapt it. AI mostly just looks at what is statistically what is most likely based on training data. If 1 piece of data exists, it will copy, not paraphrase. Example was from I think copilot where it just printed out the code and comments from an old game verbatim. I think Quake2. It isn't intelligence, it is statistical copying.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Well, mathematics cannot be copyrighted. In most countries at least.