this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
105 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43597 readers
1434 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google, DuckDuckGo and Bing now all return the same shitty LLM-generated nonsense sites to most of my searches, and don't respect my literal search terms even when I put them in quotes.

I'm not ready to pay for search, yet.

Is there any alternative?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Posted this previously:


yes. use any of the following, in no particular order:

  • ecosia.org - A non-profit certified B corp that plants trees by serving ads in your search results. Bing search underneath.
  • duckduckgo.com - A privacy friendly search engine. Primarily sourced from Bing but mixes in a few other sources.
  • any SearXNG instance - A self-hostable search front-end to various search engines.
  • marginalia.nu - specifically 'random' - An independent DIY search engine that focuses on non-commercial content, and attempts to show you sites you perhaps weren't aware of in favor of the sort of sites you probably already knew existed.
[โ€“] Dave@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think Searx is a good suggestion. Can be a bit slow to return results because it runs the search on a bunch of search engines and compiles the results, but that helps to make sure better stuff rises to the top.

Just tried it and it actually worked surprisingly well

[โ€“] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The other suggestions aren't suggestions at all. They are obsoleted by searx.space

DDG ... obsolete

startpage.com ... obsolete

Browsers have default search engines. Curse everytime, DDG is accidentally queried.

DDG is a curse word!

Any centralized site, with privacy claims, is treated as lying thru their teeth. Front run future news.

[โ€“] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[โ€“] anothermember@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you (or is anyone here) daily-driving Stract yet? I discovered it a few months ago and thought it was everything I was looking for in a search engine, but also concluded that its search results aren't up to the standard I can use for now, so I filed it as one to look out for. Would be interested in hearing others' experiences.

[โ€“] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 1 points 23 hours ago

Unfortunately not. I'd like to, but as you say it's not quite there yet. I probably should try it more frequently.

[โ€“] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Thx for sharing

Stract on github

Can self host

[โ€“] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Microsoft invests in Ecosia