this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
104 points (83.3% liked)

Games

16946 readers
478 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DillyDoobie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

First off,

"How can you wish a company to fail simply because they do not cater to you or that the produce does not please you is beyond me."

This isn't the reason people want Ubisoft to fail. Far from it, in fact. People want Ubi to fail because of how the company has conducted itself and how bad their products have declined. Wanting a company to fail because they make a bad product is a perfectly valid viewpoint. In fact, it is the very essence of how a free market should work. Bad things failing is a good thing.

Next,

"We are all on the same boat, please please please, stop spreading hate, we should all uplift each other instead of bringing each other down,"

No, there is no "WE". There is "YOU" and everyone else. Chassard, the Monetization Director, above all else, does not have the players' best interest in mind. His very existence means that elements of fun will be locked behind a purchase. He is the literal enemy in this scenario, so no, we are not on the same side. And nothing he has or ever will do as a monetization director is uplifting in any way.

I agree with you that the headline is poorly worded, but Chassard's statement is still total bullshit in my opinion.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know the part you quoted is specifically talking about negative comments coming from people who work in the gaming industry right? Not the people who buy the games but the people who make them.

The rest of your reply is irrelevant because you are attacking a strawman.

[–] DillyDoobie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You didn't address a single point I made.

You don't even know what a strawman is.

You aren't even participating in this conversation in good faith.

You're literally being triggered into making an aggressive post because of your inability to control your own emotions and think rationally.

This is a very typical hollow response of a juvenile. You really are telling people a LOT about yourself by they way you've replied. Yelling strawman and providing absolutely nothing of substance isn't proving any sort of point.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Well one of us is triggered thats obvious.