Selfhosted

39251 readers

254 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

rDNS, how? (feddit.dk)

submitted 1 year ago by drkt@feddit.dk to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm on at least 2 blocklists at this point for the crime of not having reverse DNS set up. I don't know how rDNS works. No amount of reading Wikipedia is helping me understand what I have to do.

I have a domain at a registrar which gives me bog standard DNS.
I have Apache running on my network.
I have PiHole running on my network.

My understanding is that rDNS is not set up at my registrar, but somewhere in my network. What do I do?

Thank you for your time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it's only very few people. If my ISP blocks these ports, why 99% of people have no issues?

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I'd install wireshark and see if I'm getting their TCP connections at all.

Given your other routing issues though, I would guess you have another config issue on your firewall.

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

  5.186.33.87 > 89.150.135.135: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 43476, length 40
12:38:19.843890 d0:50:99:81:48:17 > 4c:6d:58:4a:97:d4, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 21715, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 60, bad cksum 0 (->1dc0)!)
    89.150.135.135 > 5.186.33.87: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 43476, length 40
12:38:20.219177 d0:50:99:81:48:17 > 4c:6d:58:4a:97:d4, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 43: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 32958, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 29, bad cksum 0 (->3f6d)!)

Packet capture from the router for 4 pings from him to me. ~~2 of 8 packets expected were captured and~~ have bad checksums. Disregard, all 8 expected packets do show up