this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
422 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
2855 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Police in England installed an AI camera system along a major road. It caught almost 300 drivers in its first 3 days.::An AI camera system installed along a major road in England caught 300 offenses in its first 3 days.There were 180 seat belt offenses and 117 mobile phone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why are people saying this is a hypersurveillance dystopian nightmare? Guys, you are still in public! The only difference between this and having police officers sitting there and looking is this is much cheaper and more efficient. The recordings are still being sent to a human being for review.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is the whole "give an inch, they take a mile." We don't know what rights this may take away from us in the future. So in the now, always question

[–] PooCrafter93@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I understand this argument. In my mind there is no anonymity when driving, (and in my mind there shouldn't be) and the responsibility you have as a driver have that makes this permissible.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago

A valid and reasonable point. The problem is that often it spills out of it's original intent. The "think of children" argument springs to mind

load more comments (2 replies)