this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
798 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

55940 readers
4880 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I mean, Elon sucks, but I am kind of happy to hear Twitter might fully die. I've always hated the idea of forced character limits.

The world needs more critical and expansive discussion, not additional reasons to summerize and minimize important topics into long headlines.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In the case of longer form thought, Twitter provided links. What’s the problem?

[–] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

People just like to rage over things on the internet. I suspect they also don't know how to get to the fkn point rather than ramble like they're waxing poetic on a topic. Reddit is full of that shit.

[–] DulyNoted@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's just a human problem. You or I may like to read long form journalism, but we're in the extreme minority. It's not dying because it was so hugely profitable.

Logistically too, if you're trying to parse through the top 100 tweets in a day, and each one takes multiple paragraphs to get to the point, the amount of various viewpoints the average person is able to interact with shrinks dramatically.

Granted, it seems like everyone is taking the forced brevity as an excuse to just write +1 to pile onto their side, since that's easier.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I feel like there has to be a medium between "Tweets that shoot context in the head" and "Autobiography attached to a macaroni and cheese recipe". The need for sites to keep you there encourages complete nonsense that doesn't contribute to the thing I'm there for, and so turns me away from long form anything. I got shit to do and a thousand articles competing for attention, most of which were written by bots and contain nothing. The whole scheme is just broken.

I feel like I had a thesis when I started this comment and I forgot where I was going...

[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

...they said concisely in a short internet comment.

[–] Thisisforfun@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

He was free to ramble on for thousands of words though