this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
102 points (97.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8250 readers
535 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 28 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Bethesda has already run up against the wall of insurmountable expectations with Starfield, which by most measures was good but not great. That's resulted in a sub-60% user rating on Steam and a general sense that the game was somehow a failure—or at the very least, a fumble.

Ah no. The problem with Starfield is mostly that they didn't know where to go with it.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They thought the open planets concept would be as appealing as the open worlds concept and it's not cuz the world's are boring.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 7 hours ago

I could understand that moons are moons, but maybe juuuust maybe have more than like 5 different POIs?

We all know Bethesdas plan was to let modders make their game for them while they charge you for it under the guise of "we want creators to make money!"