this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
102 points (88.1% liked)

News

22561 readers
5312 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Retail experts have long sounded the alarm on malls in the US.

But malls are not going extinct, they are merely adapting to a new environment. In fact, many have reported robust occupancy levels and bigger crowds than before the pandemic, according to a recent market analysis from Coresight Research.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A walkable city, but with no housing and surrounded by acres and acres of parking.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I understand that it isn't a walkable city. But the inside shows why we should work towards walkable cities.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I’d also stipulate there is at least one way walkable cities should be more like malls. Everyone wants to get rid of cars , for good reason, but what about everyone else? Good walkable cities still need to provide better ways for someone to drive to the city and leave their car.

We’d all benefit from more park-n-rides surrounding a town center, more long term parking. Let’s welcome people not yet ready to give up their cars, the opportunity to give them up part time

[–] gramathy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good walkable cities should have appropriate rural transport so you don’t need to drive into town and can take a five dollar train ride with no traffic instead that includes return fare and takes you right to main destination districts.

Seattles ferry network, for example.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We almost have that in Boston. You can drive in and park on the edge of the train network, then take a $2.40 ride anywhere in the system, and it gets you almost everywhere.

Well, when the trains aren't on fire, anyway.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Seattle ferries:

  • Not $5
  • Still need transit to and from terminals
  • Slow as fuck
[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's interesting! I hadn't thought about that, but it's a good point.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

When I lived in L.A., we would drive to the train station all the time if we were doing something like going downtown. It was too far to walk to the station, but there was parking and the train was convenient. So I absolutely agree with you.

[–] GarytheSnail@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

The mall closest to me has started to build a TON of apartments around, and attached, to the mall.

Its starting to look appealing, and that mall is always buzzing.

Its like they figured out people don't want to drive, then walk. They just want to walk.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

A lot of malls I can think of (in both my current and previous city) do have tons of housing around them (though admittedly they also tend to waste a ton of space on parking). Some are admittedly a mixed bag. My parents live near a mall that is surrounded by a giant suburb and not that many medium density apartments. Though the biggest mall in that city is downtown and is positively surrounded by high density housing. Another reaaaally big mall is in a street that frankly is terrible for walking despite being full of businesses (it's a really long, low density street), but the entire back side of the mall is residences and lots of medium density at that.

In my current city, one of the biggest malls is kinda similar to that. It's got mostly detached housing near it. But it's directly on our LRT and that makes it super accessible for probably the majority of high density housing residents, which counts as walkable in my book. A significant number of people can get there in 10-20 minutes by convenient and frequent public transit. The other big mall is also on the LRT but the other side of the city. It's got much more housing near by, including a large amount of high density apartments. There's also a smaller mall more in the middle that is just surrounded by high density apartments. That mall has been hit really hard by COVID, but at least the street it's on is full of life. It doesn't make for traditional mall experiences (e.g., no food court), but it's still a super walkable area, regularly hosts mini festivals outside, and is also on the LRT route.

As I type this, I think it really drives home that LRTs and subways are utterly critical for walkable cities. Literally all the malls I've mentioned are major transit hubs (which makes them great to live near if you want to take transit), but buses relatively suck compared to LRT/subway. The ability to just head to a station without having to know the schedule is extremely convenient and the frequency also just makes it more viable to get to the mall quickly. I've used public transit for years in both cities (and to get to all the mentioned malls), but the best experiences are definitely with the LRT. The LRT also makes high density housing a lot more sensical, since being close to the LRT stations is extremely convenient and high density housing is the most scalable way to achieve that.