this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
173 points (95.8% liked)

Games

32449 readers
1282 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] aesthelete@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The existing ages system seemed really bad in some of the games I played. You'd have like nuclear warfare while neighboring countries on the same continent hadn't developed agriculture. I know countries develop at different rates, but like India didn't have to research and upgrade its way through multiple ages in real life in order to have cities and technology companies.

[โ€“] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

There should almost be some sort of technological transfer to nearby empires, like cultural influence. If your neighbour is at 10000 tech points or whatever while you are at 1000, you should be able to leech some tech points from your neighbour to develop faster.

Transfer rate increases with the disparity between nations and decreases with distance.

So a super advanced empire on continent A will contribute to nations on continent A and B, but those on continent A get more of a bonus than those on B.

This aligns fairly well with reality as neighbouring countries would transfer students to universities all the time, less so the further the nations are apart.