Games

16690 readers

303 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

199

As the Borderlands movie slides into oblivion and Risk of Rain 2's new DLC burns, Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford compares himself to The Beatles, who he says only "had a 25% hit rate" (www.gamesradar.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kinda a double dose of dumb there. The Beatles were prolific af, AND 1 in 4 songs were top 10. They could easily spawn a dozen memorable bands with all their music. But sure, lol.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I went to Wikipedia to check the numbers :

The group's "main catalogue"—songs released between 1962 and 1970—consists of 213 songs

So that's like 50+ songs that were "hits", wake me up when Gearbox releases 200+ games and 50 of those are nominated for at least one awards

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

nominated for at least one awards

I get what you're saying, but this is a completely useless metric.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah idk what else can be a testimony of a game being a "hut" ; I don't trust metacritic scores either

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Sale count and player numbers on launch would be better I suppose

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also, it’s not like the songs that didn’t make the charts were bad, they just didn’t hit the charts.

Back then I believe only singles were eligible for the charts, not the rest of the album.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also, back then, and up until the late 00s, you bought albums, singles were a thing and plenty popular, but mainly if you liked a band you bought their album.

The beatles hit number 1 for 90% of their studio albums.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

The beatles hit number 1 for 90% of their studio albums.

And their worst album (yellow submarine) was 3rd.