this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
49 points (91.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21180 readers
1031 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    49
    So technical question... (infosec.pub)
    submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by genuineparts@infosec.pub to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    I have been using Linux for a few years, usually some flavor of Debian. But recently I acquired an older Thinkpad and thought it would behoove me to use something more... involved.
    So I chose to dive into Manjaro and only broke pacman once. So now the question... can I say I'm using Arch btw or is that a faux pas?

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Also a pro tip: Use endeavourOS not manjaro, it's more stable

    [–] genuineparts@infosec.pub 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I feel my life is too stable. I need more excitement.

    [–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Don't update any arch based distro for long enough and your life will be plenty exciting when you do. Bonus points if you use a non-lts kernel that can blip out of existence at any moment along with all the graphics drivers

    [–] shadowbert@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

    I learnt this the hard way when I worked out my shutdown script that did this automatically had stopped working :P

    [–] Marty@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    How long is to long? I've been running the same arch install for a few years and wondering if it supposed to be time for a reinstall?

    *I also have backups of all my configs and read the arch news before updating so I'm not really that worried.

    [–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    Are you not updating it regularly? They said, "Don't update for long enough..."

    [–] Marty@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

    ...oh, yeah I miss read that. I took it as don't use arch for to long without reinstalling rather than don't not update for too long. I update about once a week.

    [–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Arch is relatively unstable just by being rolling, but manjaro is another level of unstable lol. if wish to use it, im not gonna stop you, but I'd advise you not to rely on the computer you install it on.

    [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

    Yeah you don't want your computer to be stable for 5 years going, that's very un-Arch.

    [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

    Hilarious.