this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
26 points (93.3% liked)

movies

1733 readers
507 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
maegul@lemmy.ml
Blaze@lemm.ee
UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
orangeNgreen@lemmy.world
neidu2@feddit.nl
Emperor@feddit.uk
TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
maegul@lemm.ee
26
The Crow Review (www.joblo.com)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk to c/movies@lemm.ee
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Considering this site seemed to be posting negative vibes about the film, I find it interesting that they give it 6 out of 10, slightly above average.

EDIT: The Hollywood Reporter was not impressed.

The Crow is a sluggish, overly self-serious gloomfest that never takes wing. Given the long string of directors and lead actors attached to the project over its 16 years of on-off development, the overworked, lifeless result should be no surprise. I suppose at least we were spared the Mark Wahlberg version.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

6 out of 10 is the new 2. People don't know how to rate things anymore. It makes everything difficult to gauge. The Chinese restaurant in town near me has a 4.7/5 on Google and it's the most disgusting food I've ever eaten, yet it has the same score as the actually good restaurants nearby.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

None of us are allowed to give lower than a 4 rating because of stupid contract based work apps and an algorithm that decides to not show low value options below 4 stars or allow for them anywhere.

It's bled into so many things but the ratings between 2 -> 7 might as well all mean the same thing.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And corporate acts like it, treating an honest 4/5 as if an employee called you a slur.

Any metric that becomes a goal ceases to be a useful metric.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

This started in the early 2000's already and I remember discussing back then that the customers also treated a 5/10 as "okay" when scoring a place, but would never consider going to an "okay" place when looking for one so the businesses started to beg for higher scores and the threshold fot "okay" kept moving up.