this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
943 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32510 readers
650 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reusable masks I would suggest. We don't want a huge pile of plastic waste.

[–] Piers@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Reusable masks only go so far. Any mask will reduce your risk of spreading the virus to others. But a good mask will do so far better, and only a good mask will protect you from infection from others.

For reusable masks, the only good ones either are either only good for a limited number of washes or require replacing a disposable filter the provides the actual protection (and so are mostly just holders for the disposable masks. It's possible that the extra material saved using disposable filters vs disposable masks is not equal to the additional resources required to make the mask they fit into.)

Most reusable masks people wear tend to only provide ok protection for others and none for themselves. Often the ones I see provide very little protection for others and are really just a concession to following the word but not spirit of the rules.

I'd rather encourage people to use disposables that are usually far more effective than the reusables they would otherwise use personally.

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No masks, no waste. More infections, higher mortality rate, les people even lesser waste, better … /dark

[–] SnowBunting@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

That's one positive outlook for the whole of earth.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The disposable masks are reusable until they're dirty, worn or damaged. They shouldn't be reused if you think you've been in a high exposure area but if you wear it while in the corner store for 2 minutes, you can safely reuse it.