Selfhosted

39251 readers

217 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

How do you manage your Docker-compose or Podman data? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 1 year ago by smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

All the times I just put docker-compose.yml to one user (my user) directory and call it a day.

But what about a service with multiple admins or with more horizontally split up load?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I had Portainer setup, but it was clunky and the web UI added little value.

Now I just have a local git repo with a directory for each compose stack and run docker compose commands as needed. The repo holds all yaml and config files I care to keep track. Env variables are in gitignored .env files with similar .env.example in version control. I keep sensitive info in my password manager if I have to recreate a .env from its example counterpart.

To handle volumes, I avoid docker-managed volumes at all costs to favor cleaner bind mounts instead. This way the data for each stack is always along with the corresponding configuration files. If I care about keeping the data, it's either version controlled (when mostly text) or backed up with kopia (when mostly binary).

[–] retrodaredevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I do something similar, but I avoid gitignore at all costs because any secret data should have root read only permissions on it. Plus any data that is not version controlled goes in a common directory, so all I have to do is backup that directory and I'm good. It makes moving between machines easy if I ever need to do that.