this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
827 points (96.3% liked)

World News

31540 readers
807 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The biggest issue I’m seeing is there’s other research that is the opposite of that so it keeps going back and forth which is problematic and hard to parse.

Edit: Like others stated that site is extremely sketchy and I’m very skeptical of their credibility.