this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
875 points (97.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20731 readers
862 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The thing about arch, is that if you have a basic understanding of the terminal and computers, the arch wiki can get from that level to a real expert.

So if you ask me, anyone with a basic understanding of the terminal, and a goal to improve, should go with arch.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can you define a basic understanding of the terminal?

Your basic and my basic could be wildly different.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Know how to use it, understand the basic file system structure, know basic commands (ls, which, cat, mkdir, chmod)

[–] prayer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Having completed "Hacknet", the hit 2015 hacker simulator video game.

(Only half joking)

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I played 2 hours of that game. I wondered how close it was to reality. Do those programs that you call in game have real life counterparts?

[–] CorvidCawder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Mostly yes, but they're in general oversimplified (for obvious reasons)

But it's more about offensive cyber security than necessarily the Linux part. The Linux part is just file system navigation and not much more, the rest is the "hacking" part, and that's what I'm talking about

Disclaimer: I did not complete it, but I got pretty far, and I worked in the cyber security area.

I would however say it's not a good place if you want to learn as that's not really the game's focus. There are better resources out there like overthewire and linuxjourney for that

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This was my experience just setting it up as dualboot and not doing super much with it. Sure I failed installing it a few times but I came out with more understanding of file systems, and in the end the wiki told me everything I needed to know.

[–] Racingradar@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Oh I feel that, the wiki is a god send. Even for none arch related problems at times.

Arch + manpages + wiki is all you need

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except, if I want that experience again I can just go back to Slackware.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I installed Slackware from 24 floppies I downloaded from a Volkerdings personal server, because I didn't have a CD ROM. I installed using documentation printed on a dot matrix printer that was versions out of date.. It took a day to compile a kernel. I've had to manually patch drivers (3c509 baaabyyy).

I dreamed about a future where I never had to do that again. Arch pisses me off.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah the old vortex boomerang. That takes me back.
I admit I did sometimes enjoy a good kernel panic with the Aeeeiiiiiiiii scream in the text. When I was expecting it.