Technology

57997 readers

5415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

333

62% of Funded Blockchain and Web3 Companies Attract Fewer Than 100 Monthly Organic Visitors (guerrillabuzz.com)

submitted 1 month ago by thinkabu@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Damn all the comments seem to be heavily downvoted for some reason. Interesting. What advantages can blockchain bring you, other than crypto?

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (19 children)

It's pretty good at proving digital chain of custody. You could, for example, handle public records on a block chain.

I've been hoping for a game platform that tokenizes game licenses so that we can sell or gift them to others when we're done with them - basically steam but you own your copy of the game and can sell it on. This is incredibly unlikely to happen though, a secondary market for digital licenses would eviscerate profits.

[–] msage@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I can't help but throw this down here:

FUCKING STOP LIMITING DIGITAL ASSETS WITH LICENSES.

Digital is the only realm where you can make FREE* copies of EVERYTHING**. Why do people argue for making additional limitations of such capabilities is beyond me.

I know why companies and rich people want to create artificial scarcity even in the digital world. And I guess some poor shmucks think they can get richer, but it's not true.

So stop with the 'dEcEnTrAlIzEd OwNeRsHiP lOdGeR' bullshit, and enjoy the FREE* copies of everything we have.

Copies take space and (usually) internet traffic, so they incur costs. But those are negligible, as we use those anyway. I'm not going to elaborate on how to support the creators, and crypto won't solve it

** Fuck DRM, avoid shit that comes with it, even Steam if possible

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I buy a short $5 indie game. I give it away afterwards digitally to a friend. The next guy does the same thing. And the next guy.

Now the developer has to primarily make money by selling merch or ingame ads. No thanks. If the game is good, people will buy it.

You could argue people did this with physical media. But it was not nearly as impactful; I couldn't click a few buttons in seconds and hand the game away.

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 4 weeks ago

So you opened another can of worms.

I would be very glad if we would stop with game sales altogether. Instead, add option to support the developer and platform. Completely unrelated to the amount of people and hours played.

Just download the game (ideally through P2P), enjoy it, 'donate' if you like it, however much you like.

For online games, you have a pool for keeping servers alive, if it runs out, open-source it, and let users with the maintenance.

Like I would have donated much more to Terraria than to Devil May Cry 5.

load more comments (16 replies)

load more comments (17 replies)