this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
87 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43755 readers
1261 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As kids, we're told only people who go to college/university for politics/economics/law are qualifiable to make/run a country. As adults, we see no nation these "qualified" adults form actually work as a nation, with all manifesto-driven governments failing. Which to me validates the ambitions of all political theorist amateurs, especially as there are higher hopes now that anything an amateur might throw at the wall can stick. Here's my favorite from a friend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think anyone who wants to lead a country or hold office should be forbidden from it. Figure out some qualifications to disqualify anyone truly unfit to lead and have a lottery for everyone else. Maybe give out extra entries for volunteering or other public service, but make the process uncorruptable.

Then at the end of their term everyone gets to vote on how good a job they did. Maybe execute or imprison anyone who gets a bad enough score. If you get high enough, you get a nice pension and favorable mentions in history books. Either way, no one is eligible to be picked again. They could advise the next administration if everyone agreed.

I can think of a hundred ways this could go badly, but I'm not sure the result would be any worse than what we've got.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

and have a lottery for everyone else.

Man I hate being the head of budget and finance for the city...

Then at the end of their term everyone gets to vote on how good a job they did. Maybe execute or imprison anyone who gets a bad enough score.

Fuck..

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not really a fan of execution. It would be a shame if that happened in any but the worst cases. Just trying to motivate doing one's best. Maybe you only need the carrot and not the stick.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Man I hate being the head of budget and finance for the city…