this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
1113 points (99.4% liked)

pics

19376 readers
189 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But the miniseries is just a carbon-copy of the radio programme…

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that a bad thing? It's a different medium that can reach a much wider audience. I'd bet that at least 80% of people who enjoy the BBC miniseries have never heard of the radio program.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

It’s kind of neutral in my opinion.

It would have been better if it varied more from the radio show as the books did, and the special effects were largely cringeworthy if a product of the time and budget. The animations were very good though.

My point was that it doesn’t particularly support the idea that all the different versions have been drastically different.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It's a fairly close adaptation, but not the same. And even if it was, why would that affect what they said?