this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
333 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
2855 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JunglGeorg@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I guess most people know a scam when they see one. More than I thought

[–] Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if you were extremely generous and didn't factor in the scams in your analysis, the reality is that a Blockchain solves problems 99.9% of people will never face. This breaks the whole imagined model, when your product is ultra niche but relies on mass adoption for its security.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still hope that it can be used to make efficient transparent democracy somehow 😂😅

[–] knightly@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

There's no benefit there that would be useful to anyone. If you need a public ledger then you can just do that and skip the crypto BS

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Public ledgers are "crypto BS".

[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Public ledgers predate crypto BS by decades and are not improved by cryptographic chaining between entries.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And what about ledger that use DAG instead of blockchain, did they exist pre crypto BS?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

Giving your cryptographic chaining a pointless acronym doesn't make it useful.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea, I was talking about a public ledger where the people ruled by the government host nodes and verify that laws and other stuff decided by the government are all stored there to make it harder for politicians to lie because everyone has the truth and can verify it.

Well something like this, I am not an expert in this, but I can imagine it having a use case there

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am an expert in this and cryptographic chaining of a public ledger is like large language models, interesting but ultimately useless.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would not say that LLM are useless, just a bit overhyped

I am way more efficient in learning to code having this text bot give me explanations e.g. what which kernel API does

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But you have to check to make sure the chatbot isn't hallucinating the answers it gives you, so you could be even more efficient by just looking it up in the first place and skipping the extra step.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Well, I just run the code and see if it works, in like 97% (or even more) of the time, it works as the bot said.

[–] lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's ignore crypto for a second...

People in the USA loose around $10.000.000.000 per year to scams according to FTC...

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That number would be even higher if everyone used untraceable and non-reversible crypto transactions.

That's probably true, but just to highlight this: Bitcoin is not untraceable

[–] Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

Even if you were extremely generous and didn't factor in the scams in your analysis, the reality is that a Blockchain solves problems 99.9% of people will never face. This breaks the whole imagined model, when your product is ultra niche but relies on mass adoption for its security.