this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
404 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

58135 readers
4099 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
404
Musk's X sues advertisers over alleged 'massive advertiser boycott'. (www.voanews.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

I would think. And if that proof exists, it will come up at the appropriate time during legal proceedings. I'm skeptical there is any.

I guess they could call the entire existence of GARM to be collusion; companies banding together to "punish" companies who don't follow their guidelines. But X is (was?) a voluntary member of GARM, so it seems that would be a difficult argument for them to make without implicating themselves too.