this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
528 points (98.0% liked)

memes

9658 readers
4070 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Honestly ... I think that's a myth. I have 200+ FF Nightly tabs open, and I did have up to five tab groups with 100+ tabs each, as well as dozens of Addons, including the notoriously laggy Dark Reader, and I don't notice any slowdown I wouldn't call acceptable - just the usual suspects (Teams and google apps) are crap, but that's just incompatibility with standards on their part. And I don't have any crazy PC or something, just a pretty old 5 2600 and for the most part 16 GB Ram (which did get pretty tight with Minecraft, Idea and FF running), now 32 GB Detotaded Wam.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both Firefox (see about:unloads) & Chromium have a feature to unload old tabs when running low on memory. On session restore all tabs start unloaded

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

Yep. I even have an extension to manually unload tabs/tab groups. That's why I wonder why even IT people say more tabs = worse performance.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't realize Dark Reader was laggy or known to be laggy but it makes sense. It doesn't matter in any case, you'd have to pry it from my cold dead eyes

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Well it does alter the whole website, in consideration of other parts of the website, which means it fully parses it. Therefore a website is basically handled two or three times before it's finally displayed.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can't you just.... Close them? Why you you need 200 tabs? You do know about bookmarks right?

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bookmarks, do you have any idea how much more time it takes to delete a bookmark

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a right click and delete. I keep a folder called tmp for exactly this reason. I really don't understand why people do it but man it is infuriating watching someone do it. Maybe it's a bit of ocd tendencies but I absolutely hate it.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

I just shove the tabs in a seperate window and let them eat a couple gigs of RAM, webpages need a little snack sometimes.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Because they're all active projects, and most of them are open "just in case I need that exact piece of information again".

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 1 month ago

only effect I have is on startup and it using a lot of memory