this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
2058 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58092 readers
2941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO -- you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it's not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 74 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why not just recommend not using Chrome...?

[–] warm@kbin.earth 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Switching to another Chromium-based browser is a half-measure. Other Chromium-based browsers are on borrowed time.

As time goes on, it will become more difficult for them to maintain v2 support. Nobody has the resources to properly maintain a browser fork with more than minor modifications. And you can bet Google will go out of their way to make this difficult for everybody else.

I mean, sure, use what you're comfortable with if you really can't use a non-Chromium-based browser for some reason. But it means you're likely going to have to jump ship again sooner or later. Why not just jump once, to something with better long-term prospects?

Then again, the folks behind Arc Browser have expressed interest in becoming engine-agnostic, so perhaps there will be a Chromium-free Arc version in the future. That would be very cool.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They don't need to maintain V2, they can bundle native adblockers like Cromite.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 1 month ago

Other Chromium-based browsers are on borrowed time. As time goes on, it will become more difficult for them to maintain v2 support.

And Firefox won't? I just explained why you don't even need v2 support.

Nobody has the resources to properly maintain a browser fork with more than minor modifications.

Except...all of them?

And you can bet Google will go out of their way to make this difficult for everybody else.

If and when that becomes a problem, I can change later just like I can today... Today it is not a problem.