this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
320 points (87.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21180 readers
881 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    320
    I don't think I'll continue using Arch, btw (lemmy.ohaa.xyz)
    submitted 3 months ago by FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    But also I thought Linux distros normally keep the old Kernel around after an update so stuff like this doesn’t cause a boot failure?

    Arch has no concept of "previous package", so it doesn't do this.

    You could install linux-lts (or one of the other alternative kernels) side by side with the linux package, so you always have a bootable fallback, but like most things on Arch it's not enforced.

    [–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

    That's pretty wild, I guess arch is not meant to hold your hand at all so it makes sense.