this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
196 points (95.4% liked)

Europe

1482 readers
484 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/11683421

The EU has quietly imposed cash limits EU-wide:

  • €3k limit on anonymous payments
  • €10k limit regardless (link which also lists state-by-state limits).

From the jailed¹ article:

An EU-wide maximum limit of €10 000 is set for cash payments, which will make it harder for criminals to launder dirty money.

It will also strip dignity and autonomy from non-criminal adults, you nannying assholes!

In addition, according to the provisional agreement, obliged entities will need to identify and verify the identity of a person who carries out an occasional transaction in cash between €3 000 and €10 000.

The hunt for “money launderers” and “terrorists” is not likely meaningfully facilitated by depriving the privacy of people involved in small €3k transactions. It’s a bogus excuse for empowering a police surveillance state. It’s a shame how quietly this apparently happened. No news or chatter about it.

¹ the EU’s own website is an exclusive privacy-abusing Cloudflare site inaccessible several demographics of people. Sad that we need to rely on the website of a US library to get equitable access to official EU communication.

update


The Pirate party’s reaction is spot on. They also point out that cryptocurrency is affected. Which in the end amounts to forced banking.

#warOnCash

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dude, tax collection has been optimized for hundreds of years before we even had electronic money.

They even got Al Capone.

Money laundering is the opposite of tax evasion. If you don't understand that those two things are not the same, then I can't really help you.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All of you guys focus on some billionaires, mafia bosses etc but we're talking about 3k/10k EUR limits.

I'm asking how do you audit cash-heavy businesses doing petty tax fraud cost effectively?

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You weren't asking anything. You were just lumping things together.

To audit tax fraud, just audit the books. If a restaurant is full on a Friday night, but the books show few sales, then you have your evidence.

If someone buys a new car and has a nice house, but claims their business is hardly making profit, then the tax authority can demand they explain the source of their income.

Again, this is how they got Al Capone 100 years ago.

Money laundering is much more difficult and it's the opposite. Because the laundering restaurant can just write in the books that they sold 100 more cocktails on a Friday night, paid by cash. And they also pay the required tax on it.

To combat money laundering, you need to audit the customers of the establishment, which is why they want to reduce the usage of cash.

But instead of turning the EU into East Germany, we should just stop criminalizing vices and regulate that, which is the main source of dirty money.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Seems like your solution costs more than it brings to the budget and all that you're gaining is false sense of privacy.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am not proposing any new solution. Tax collection agencies across the European Union already audit businesses and it's a revenue generating activity.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you're fine with tax collection being ineffective, got it. All taxation is theft and so on, right?

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Dude, I have talked to AI bots that are more intelligent than this

Tax collection is very effective. Extremely effective, even.

That's my whole point.