this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
632 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3746 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

IT administrators are struggling to deal with the ongoing fallout from the faulty CrowdStrike update. One spoke to The Register to share what it is like at the coalface.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the administrator, who is responsible for a fleet of devices, many of which are used within warehouses, told us: "It is very disturbing that a single AV update can take down more machines than a global denial of service attack. I know some businesses that have hundreds of machines down. For me, it was about 25 percent of our PCs and 10 percent of servers."

He isn't alone. An administrator on Reddit said 40 percent of servers were affected, along with 70 percent of client computers stuck in a bootloop, or approximately 1,000 endpoints.

Sadly, for our administrator, things are less than ideal.

Another Redditor posted: "They sent us a patch but it required we boot into safe mode.

"We can't boot into safe mode because our BitLocker keys are stored inside of a service that we can't login to because our AD is down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 31 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like the best time to unionize

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm in. This world desperately needs an information workers union. Someone to cover those poor fuckers in the help desk and desktop support as well as the engineers and architects that keep all of this shit running.

Those of us that aren't underpaid are treated poorly. Today is what it looks like if everybody strikes at once.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This dude here coming in hot with a name, Information Workers Union (IWU). Love it

Soo are you gonna create the community or am I?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah.

Bureau of Information & Technology Servicers.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago

I'm too chicken.

[–] gari_9812@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Any time is a good time to unionize

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Agreed, just here they have then by the metaphorical balls.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To preface, I want to see a tech workers union so, so bad.

With that said, I genuinely don't believe that most tech workers would unionize. So many of them are brainwashed into thinking that a union would dictate all salaries, would force hiring to be domestic-only, or would ensure jobs for life for incompetent people. Anyone that knows what a union does in 2024 knows that none of that has to be true. A tech union only needs to be a flat fee every month, guaranteed access to a lawyer with experience in your cases/employer, and the opportunity to strike when a company oversteps. It's only beneficial.

Even if you could get hundreds of thousands of signatories, the recent layoffs have shown that tech companies at the highest level would gladly fire a sizable number of employees if it meant stamping out a union. As someone that has conducted interviews in big tech, the sheer numbers at peak of people that had applied for some roles was higher than the number of active employees in the whole company. In theory, Google could terminate everyone and replace them with brand-new workers in a few months. It would be a fucking mess, but it (in theory) shows that if a Google or Apple decided that it wanted no part of unions they could just dig into their fungible talent pool, fire a ton of people, promote people that stayed, and fill roles with foreign or under-trained talent.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel you with this. They do not see themselves as workers. Thank you for the preface.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, sadly to many there is still the view of tech being a meritocracy, and that they're in FAANG because of their hard work over everything else, so fuck everyone else. Naturally, many change their tune once their employer actions regressive policies, but it's surprising how many people just have zero understanding of what a union does. They see cop shows or The Wire and assume it'll be like the unions there...

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

All true.. All sad. Time to snap some fools to reality I guess