this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
1559 points (96.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53911 readers
398 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

wow just wow while i can't say i didn't see this one coming but it always amazes me where greed could lead someone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I think it's less enforceable than they think - every system someone sets up will eventually be circumvented.

It'll be a pain for a few months, or we'll see a federated alt pick up creators.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

To be honest, YouTube would be the hardest thing to replace. And if they ever stream ads from the same URLs as content I don't see a blocker being overly successful.

[–] Rotten_potato@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I disagree, something like Sponsorblock is working quite well already for ads embedded in the video and unless YouTube makes serious sacrifices in UX I don't see how they could prevent this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)