this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
155 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

58013 readers
3790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 121 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Speculation on my part but i think it’s the same thing as Boeing really. They didn’t have any real competition for so long and they started cutting out the engineers who innovated to improve stock price.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nokia is another example. They were leading in mobile tech, only to struggle keeping up with smart phones.

They’re so heavily optimized in old tech they can’t adapt to new tech.

[–] Teknikal@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd say they just didn't go touchscreen in time I remember a friend having the first iPhone and another had a Nokia n95 The N95 was way ahead in features and technology but people wowed over the Apple screen..

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 8 points 1 month ago

They also did other weird decisions like focusing on Symbian, and then move all their attention on Windows. Nobody cared about Symbian or Windows. Everything was on Android and iOS.

They were too slow to adapt to the new market, and when they adapted they did so in the wrong way.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I had a Nokia touchscreen smartphone (Nokia 5800) and it was awful

The iPhone was launched 2 years before that, but I couldn’t afford it, assumed that Nokia did a comparable job. Boy how I was wrong!

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There used to be a saying that Intel had a vault where they paid out the next ten years of CPU tech, so when they invented something new they put it there so they could make profits and control the advancement.

Now, I’m not sure which thing they got wrong, but if it was true, I think Intel was probably caught off guard by all the speculative execution security issues and the GPU revolution (blockchain and AI).

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

I agree, the speculative execution failure feels like the start of the bad times for modern Intel.